Hi, On being told I had a test revolving around cosmological arguments and starting my research, I found something somewhat interesting. After watching you and a few people concisely tear apart the kalam in words more aptly chosen than my own I moved on to Aquinas' five ways (the first three specifically). For some reason, there seems to be a large gap in the market for responses with limited posts and videos alike. Do you have an idea as to why this might be? I understand that Craig's Kalam is particularly prominent at the moment and has unparalleled sophistry skills but this superseding possibly the most prominent name in christian philosophy (bar Jesus) seems slightly bizarre to me? Either way, I'm not requesting a video on this subject be made, I see the argument as just the kalam with different word choice in essence - just interested to know if you have any idea why I see what I see.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteOn being told I had a test revolving around cosmological arguments and starting my research, I found something somewhat interesting. After watching you and a few people concisely tear apart the kalam in words more aptly chosen than my own I moved on to Aquinas' five ways (the first three specifically). For some reason, there seems to be a large gap in the market for responses with limited posts and videos alike.
Do you have an idea as to why this might be? I understand that Craig's Kalam is particularly prominent at the moment and has unparalleled sophistry skills but this superseding possibly the most prominent name in christian philosophy (bar Jesus) seems slightly bizarre to me?
Either way, I'm not requesting a video on this subject be made, I see the argument as just the kalam with different word choice in essence - just interested to know if you have any idea why I see what I see.